Presented at
31C3 (2014),
Dec. 29, 2014, 6:30 p.m.
(60 minutes).
The Maker movement and patent law are like two planets moving on the orbit of innovations. Occasionally, they collide … because the Maker planet moves too fast.
But, back on the Earth. Encounters with patent law can be of many reasons, e.g. filing a patent application or being blocked in making by a patent (or much worse, being accused of a patent infringement). The latter motivated the question of the permissible uses of patented inventions. The talk explains which activities on patents are lawful and keep Makers safe in their making.
The Maker Movement does not need to be presented. Even the White House has expressed its gratitude and admiration for individual inventors – single heroes; and the World Bank has recognised their potential.
But the daily life of Makers is not (always) that sweet and victorious. As they get more technologically advanced, they face new challenges: financial, resource-related or legal.
The project focuses on the legal aspects, specifically on patent law. There are two ways Makers meet with patents: 1) they want to obtain a patent for their solution, 2) they get confronted with a patent infringement claim. The latter led to the question of the efficacy of patent flexibilities (“patent windows”) that reduce the patent exclusivity over the use of an invention. They provide both the freedom to operate and enable defence in patent infringement lawsuits.
The project also contributes to the ongoing discussion on the reform of patent law, and suggests the re-consideration of certain legal tools in the light of the Maker phenomenon.
Beyond any doubt, Makers deserve special attention in the legal field for a number of reasons:
1) their technological contributions,
2) popularisation of democratic ideas: participation, trust and responsibility,
3) for making a part of this world better.
(The patent system shared once the same principles … before it has changed into a money-making machine.)
The reference point for the research is collective making: when an idea leaves the safe private harbour (adverbial basements and garages) and enters open waters of knowledge dissemination and commercialisation, where a patent infringement may easily occur. Against this background I analyse the scope of patent windows (statutory provisions and doctrines) stipulated in four legal systems: Germany, the UK, the USA, and Japan. I present the main construction lines and apply them to the Maker environment. There are measures, e.g. private and non-commercial use or experimental use, that work in “making” but under certain reservations.
The talk serves advising and increasing the awareness of the scope of the permissible uses on patented solutions.
Presenters:
-
Natalia Lukaszewicz
I am a PhD Candidate at the LMU Munich where I am finishing the project “A study on a patent exception for user-generated innovations”, supported by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property in Munich (2012) and GRUR (2013-2014). I also work at the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft in Patents and Licensing Department.
I graduated from European Studies (law&economics) at Poznan University (Poland), and came to Munich to participate in a postgraduate program, LLM (LMU Munich), with the intention of exploring the field of intellectual property.
From the technical point of view, I am neither a maker nor a hacker. I love to read Scientific American and … once I soldered a TV-B-gone – my first step in making. However, I am an absolute enthusiast of Makers and DIYers. I truly believe that the movement has initiated greater changes in the society (so much needed). I am very happy that my research can contribute to it.
This year I presented my work at EHSM (Hamburg).
Links:
Similar Presentations: